These Tics of Language that Hinder Your Job Interviews
Recruiters are unanimous: to make a good impression, it’s not just the clothes that matter. Your way of speaking is just as important!
“Er, actually it’s clear to me.” Stop! To look good in interviews, it is fashionable to remove some tics of language that pollute your speech and discredit it.
The punctuation words
“Indeed”, “what”, “er”, “then”. These tics of language are particularly widespread. Nevertheless, it’s annoying. “Recently a candidate has repeated at least 10 times ‘today’ during his interview, reports Aude Chrétien of the firm Alter Ego. That ends up irritating …” “There we are really in the presence of tics of language It is close to the unconscious but by preparing very carefully its interview it is possible to get rid of it.In fact, when a candidate constantly punctuates his sentences by ‘uh’, I end up pointing out and advising him to listen to me speak, I prefer a silence to a ‘heu’ ”
The words and expressions that kill
“You see what I mean, and not exactly, when the candidates think that the recruiter knows their job perfectly, it’s wrong, the goal is to start a discussion, get to know the candidate and his job, says Liselotte Huguenin Bergenat, HR manager of Regions Job. This is definitely banish “.”A little, roughly or relatively, are some of these expressions that completely discredit the candidates. We are specialized in the recruitment of salespeople, so get along answer ‘about X KE’ when asking the figure done by a candidate, that’s not good for him “,”Some candidates finish their sentence regularly by ‘here’, analysis Stephanie Hecquet, the firm Selescope. It is quite embarrassing because it cuts short any discussion.How often, they are candidates who repeat their speech but struggle to be at the listen to their interlocutor and thus to start a real exchange “.
Find Info For: government jobs
The “on” and the “I” untimely
“Everyone uses the” on “so it will not be discriminatory maintenance, but the use of” we “is preferable,” says Audi Chrétien. For Liselotte Huguenot, “the” one “does not make it possible to know exactly what the candidate has realized individually during these different missions. It is embarrassing, either I imagine that it did only collaborate without taking of Initiatives either it is a reserved person who does not wish to put forward when a job interview is precisely done for that ” . Be careful, however, not to abuse the “me, me, me, I” …”When questioning the candidate on team achievements and he responds I did that, I led things in this way, it necessarily appears egocentric,” said Pascal Larue.
The jargon of the company, of the position
“Each professional environment has its own codes and expressions, so it is normal to use them, as long as it can be annoying. The candidates must keep in mind that their interlocutor does not necessarily evolve his sector. But everything is a question of nuance. When a candidate explains to you in a way too scholarly the meaning of a word, it can also displease. And finally, it is not necessary to say “I will not go too much in the detail, it would not interest you. On the contrary! It’s lost, “says Liselotte Huguenin-Bergenat.
The mistakes of French
“In interview, we expect candidates a vocabulary as much as possible but also they avoid as much as possible to make mistakes in French, Judge Audi Chrétien. These are sometimes small things stupid – like to be wrong between “from” and “to” to mark the possession of an object – but that make tick … “.”During an interview, a candidate told me:” During my experiences, I acquired such and such skills. Quite frankly, it stings, especially if the candidate does not take care of himself, “adds Liselotte Huguenot.